From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 16:55:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFB31065670 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:55:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9338FC1D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBIGtXnv003715; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:55:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBIGtVQ7003712; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:55:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:55:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Pieter Donche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081218175514.B3711@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081218124318.09f16d42@gumby.homeunix.com> <20081218151324.698ccb72@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:55:41 -0000 >> README.html). > > So since it's faster and doesn't delete user generated files, upgrade is > always to be preferred over extract, right? unless you made BIG mess in /usr/ports - yes