From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 26 12:56:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A70D616A4CE; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:56:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EE84343D58; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:56:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7QCuCbf058623;
	Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:56:13 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:42:47 -0000."
             <200408261242.i7QCgl7m012027@repoman.freebsd.org> 
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:56:12 +0200
Message-ID: <58622.1093524972@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/concat g_concat.c src/sys/geom/label
	g_label.c src/sys/geom/mirror g_mirror.c src/sys/geom/raid3
	g_raid3.c src/sys/geom/stripe g_stripe.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:56:15 -0000

In message <200408261242.i7QCgl7m012027@repoman.freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawid
ek writes:

>  Log:
>  Skip providers with not defined sector size.

This is wrong.  A provider with a non-zero access count should always
have a sector size.  The sectorsize can not be trusted if the access
counts are zero.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.