From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 11:53:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F7D16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908743D53 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2MBr0hb007365; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:53:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <424006CF.1050003@DeepCore.dk> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:51:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Backhaus References: <42028F29.1030801@DeepCore.dk> <420A1792.900@DeepCore.dk> <421464C3.2030308@DeepCore.dk> <4240015A.2020802@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.7 cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: UPDATE3: ATA mkIII official patches - please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:53:05 -0000 Robert Backhaus wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:28:26 +0100, S=F8ren Schmidt w= rote: >=20 >>New version available for testing: >=20 > Could you tell us whether atapicam is working with your patches? Many > of us require that for gui cd authorers - I'd consider it essential > before it is merged... It wont work as is, but the maintainer has had access to this WIP long=20 before it went public, and to quote: "Feel free to commit the new framework when you see fit, I'll follow up=20 with the necessary atapi-cam updates" Other than that I'm out of that loop... > IF not, your 'academic' atacam might be a replacement, although it > means I'd have to be more careful how I allow lusers to access > /dev/passN and /dev/xptN.... I'll more likely post the patches I use for cdrecord/cdrdao/dvd+rw-tools = so they can use ATA directly.. --=20 -S=F8ren