From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  9 13:07:02 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D74137B404
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 May 2003 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974DF43FAF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 May 2003 13:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h49K70xa013401;
	Fri, 9 May 2003 22:07:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 May 2003 23:48:39 +0200."
             <xzpk7d1un2g.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 22:07:00 +0200
Message-ID: <13400.1052510820@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
Subject: Re: buildworld b?rkedinlibpam 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 20:07:02 -0000

In message <xzpk7d1un2g.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes:
>> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes:
>> > But to add to the confusion, my make universe just spat out ia64 buildworld
>> > with the same error again :-(
>> I think the problem is to order the library build.
>> Can .ORDER be applied to subdirs (or something?)
>
>The order in Makefile.inc1 is correct, but if the libraries are built
>in parallel, there is a race between libkrb5 and libpam.  I've always
>assumed the libraries *weren't* built in parallel.  You could try the
>following in case I'm wrong:

I'll run a -j12 universe tonight with this.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.