Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:49:15 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: snmp port Message-ID: <7mu1l3fw9g.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20020903075233.GR436@hsc.fr> References: <20020830205359.GA452@hsc.fr> <200208302333.32966.mdouhan@fruitsalad.org> <1030747329.8123.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020831080500.GA519@hsc.fr> <7mznuzhf0a.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20020903075233.GR436@hsc.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:20:25 +0000 (UTC),
Yann Berthier wrote:
> Ok this is another possibility. Is there precedences of rc.conf being
> used to control a port, though ?
I don't know. But this method was discussed in ports-jp@ (it seems
there is no conclusion about this).
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7mu1l3fw9g.wl>