From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 30 19:49:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46EA37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from vectors.cx (manifold.vectors.cx [64.163.147.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275FA43E4A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:49:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: from vectors.cx (26a90b76ea46b7cd6e6bebf846a2e3ef@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g9V3pait098127; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:51:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: (from monkey@localhost) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9V3pavZ098126; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:51:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:51:36 -0800 From: Adam Weinberger To: Brian Reichert Cc: Larry Rosenman , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How flexible _is_ the use of ports? Message-ID: <20021031035136.GX197@vectors.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Weinberger , Brian Reichert , Larry Rosenman , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <1036029150.442.5.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <20021030212408.N618@numachi.com> <1036031219.442.13.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <20021030213055.P618@numachi.com> <1036031545.442.15.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <20021030222723.Q618@numachi.com> <1036034966.83261.2.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <20021030223732.R618@numachi.com> <1036035547.83261.4.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <20021030224350.S618@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021030224350.S618@numachi.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.1 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-PGP-Key: http://www.vectors.cx/pgp.key.txt X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx http://www.crackula.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (10.30.2002 @ 1943 PST): Brian Reichert said, in 1.2K: << > > type graphics/tiff at that prompt. > > Yessir: > > New dependency? (? to help): graphics/tiff > Please choose one of these: > mozilla-0.9.7_2,1 pkg_tarup-1.2_3 portcheckout-2.0 > portupgrade-20020122 ruby-1.6.6 ruby-fnmatch-1.1b_1 > ruby-optparse-0.8.6 ruby-uri-0.9,1 > > And, Adam, you suggested: > > You need to install graphics/tiff > > I have to do so manually? Something here seems to have the concept > that mozilla needs tiff. > > I feel _really_ lame about this, sorry... >> end of "Re: How flexible _is_ the use of ports?" from Brian Reichert << The problem seems to be that the libraries from graphics/tiff are still there, but the entry in the port database isn't. It's fastest to just install the port manually, and stick to using portupgrade in the future when you want to upgrade stuff, portinstall when you want to add stuff, and pkg_deinstall when you wish to delete stuff. - -Adam - -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx adamw@FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9wKjIo8KM2ULHQ/0RAhqUAJ0QWHHZBYoeajdEHY0uLp7+3i3RIQCgiT2a w3eZts9HwL9JAaPB6zshZQc= =Nwy1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message