From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 7 01:33:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FA016A4CE; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:33:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C49343D45; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:33:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (c-24-130-160-161.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004030709333601600ghi16e> (Authid: domain_name_tsar); Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:33:37 +0000 Message-ID: <404AEC6F.5070103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:33:35 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.freebsd.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040214 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Polstra References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22=28Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav=29=22?= cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 09:33:38 -0000 John Polstra wrote: > On 05-Mar-2004 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >>John Baldwin writes: >> >>>"Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken and >>>that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what the >>>tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like >>>above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbox >>>assuming that it's being slammed when it's not. >> >>well, given the number of "this works fine here, what is the tinderbox >>doing wrong" comments I get... > > > I am totally sympathetic to your position, DES! It took me about > 5 years to stop getting pissed off about all the "Latest CVSup is > totally broken!" subject lines that were actually referring to state > of the FreeBSD source tree. Same problem here with mergemaster, but I decided to learn from your example John, and not get pissed off about it in the first place. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection