Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:32:58 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h acfreebsd.h acgcc.h acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h dbcmds.c dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c utglobal.c Message-ID: <20030501193258.GB778@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030501143516.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200304291911.h3TJB0E2076851@repoman.freebsd.org> <XFMail.20030501143516.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 02:35:16PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Modified files: > > sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h acfreebsd.h acgcc.h > > acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h > > dbcmds.c dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c > > hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c > > utglobal.c > > This hunk looks bogus as it didn't change during the Intel import: *snip* > Without this change make kernel-depend of LINT gives a _lot_ of > warnings. LINT also doesn't compile, but this is at least a > good first step. Unrelated to the change (hence removed), but related to ACPI CA contributed code: There's a bug in the code that uninstalls ACPI tables. We have a fix for this on the ia64 branch. Thanks to Peter. It's been forgotten, but it would be nice to have this fix in as it hosed machines with multiple SSDT tables. This is not specific to ia64. Of course, since this is contributed code we should get it fixed at the source and it will find its way back to use with the next upgrade. However, since the 0424 snapshot had problems, the first possible upgrade would be end May, provided the problems have been resolved. The question: do people think we should try to get another ACPI snapshot in (provided we have someone willing to do it) and thus try to get it fixed the "official" way or are we ok with changing contrib'd code in this case and revert to the vendor branch when we do upgrade sometime after 5.1? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030501193258.GB778>