From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 21:05:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A55316A415 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mg@fork.pl) Received: from mail.obligo.pl (bwe42.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.18.212.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5432E43CB9 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mg@fork.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.obligo.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3C95581; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:05:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at obligo.pl Received: from mail.obligo.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smb.obligo.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5TIg9ePT1UV8; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:05:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from hq.fork.pl (hq.fork.pl [217.113.238.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.obligo.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3467B5580 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:05:04 +0100 (CET) From: Marcin Gryszkalis To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:05:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <27fef5640611232116o6e26cbcbx230d13981270bb89@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <27fef5640611232116o6e26cbcbx230d13981270bb89@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: %perY3B?Ru<]v$M}WY0A)HAxTs.{"M{0~o#Zqd8`xYr@E9FS9zm9B+~!%,Ya)=?utf-8?q?SJ=3F=26WnsZO=0A=09?= Subject: Re: port redirection with natd and ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:05:14 -0000 On Friday 24 November 2006 06:16, Nilton Volpato wrote: > But Split DNS does not work in my case. Because I have different > services on different machines, and the dns will map one name (and all > ports associated to it) to one machine. > > Is there any solution that will work without using split dns? Sometimes it's possible to solve such problem with SRV records (with or without split dns zones) but not all services support it. Eg. voip/sip engines usually support it. Refer to rfc2782. regards -- Marcin Gryszkalis, PGP 0x9F183FA3 jabber jid:mg@chrome.pl, gg:2532994 http://the.fork.pl