From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 19 12:27:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA06839 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 19 May 1996 12:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA06834 for ; Sun, 19 May 1996 12:27:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA03693; Sun, 19 May 1996 13:27:04 -0600 Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 13:27:04 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199605191927.NAA03693@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Peter Mutsaers Cc: nate@sri.MT.net, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: internal compiler error In-Reply-To: <199605191130.NAA15612@plm.simplex.nl> References: <199605190343.VAA02628@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199605191130.NAA15612@plm.simplex.nl> Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > NW> Can I count on you to compile *EVERYTHING* you get your hands on > NW> when gcc 2.7.3 is released? > OK, I can do that. If it helps to get gcc 2.7.3 in, I will. > However, I was doing a make world today with pgcc (2.7.2p) and found > that the assembler has a problem with the .weak directive as produced > by this version. As said before, the binutils shall have to be > upgraded too. Actually, they don't. You simply need to tell gcc not to emit the weak directives. See the patches in ports/lang/gcc-2.7 or ports/lang/pgcc. Nate