From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 21:27:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3911816A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:27:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linda.pathlink.com (linda.pathlink.com [129.250.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1614F43D45 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:27:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Received: from kachun.pathlink.com (dvl-1.pathlink.com [129.250.170.211]) by linda.pathlink.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7ILRroG009976 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:27:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20040818141813.00b80a80@dvl.pathlink.com> X-Sender: kachun@dvl.pathlink.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:27:53 -0700 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Kachun Lee Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:03:43 +0000 Subject: Is FreeBSD 5 twe PAE safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:27:56 -0000 Hi, I asked this question about FreeBSD 4.10 in stable and got replied that the twe driver in 4.x was not PAE safe. I checked the sys/conf/i386/PAE file in 5-current and saw 'twe' was not mentioned as a 'nodevice' in that file. Is it true then FreeBSD 5-current's twe will work with PAE on (6G RAM)? If that is the case, that will solve my problem and I can upgrade that server to FreeBSD 5. If FreeBSD 5's twe will not work with PAE, is there any note/document/hint on what it take to get that to work? I got some experience in UNIX driver/disk controller and I was given the time to work on it. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Regards Kachun