From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 14:08:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA4B16A4B3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daemon.uop.edu (daemon.uop.edu [138.9.200.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D058743FDF for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:08:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wfroning@pacific.edu) Received: from daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.uop.edu (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with SMTP id h92L8Ivx018236 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:08:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wfroning@pacific.edu) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:02:28 -0700 From: Will Froning (by way of Will Froning ) To: Paul Saab Message-Id: <20031002140228.679892a6.wfroning@pacific.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031002205137.GA30467@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031002133634.716f25e2.wfroning@pacific.edu> <20031002204821.GA30153@elvis.mu.org> <20031002135014.34a4e129.wfroning@pacific.edu> <20031002205137.GA30467@elvis.mu.org> Organization: OIT, University of the Pacific X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:08:18 -0700 Resent-From: Will Froning Resent-Message-Id: <20031002140818.10a86995.wfroning@pacific.edu> Resent-To: freebsd-hackers@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6.2-p23 and [tcp bad cksum] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 21:08:23 -0000 > Which is which? The 2 boxes that didn't work, one had a Fiber EM and the other had a copper BGE running at 100 full (Dell 1650 and 2550 respectively) The 4.9-pre is a Fiber EM (dell 2600). > Which one was causing large amount of checksum errors? Both of the 4.6.2 boxes. > Which one fixed it? etc etc etc etc. Upgrading the 4.6.2 boxes to 4.8 fixed the problem allowed the messages to pass through. Although I didn't record a tcpdump when it started working, as it scrolled by I noticed a reduction in the number of errors. Shoot me an e-mail if you need more info. Thanks, Will > Will Froning (wfroning@pacific.edu) wrote: > > one was copper BGE the other a Fiber EM. > > > > Will > > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:48:21 -0700 > > Paul Saab wrote: > > > > > What NIC? > > > > > > -- > > Will Froning > > Unix Sys. Admin. > > (209)946-7470 > > (209)662-4725 > > wfroning@pacific.edu > > > > -- > -ps -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)662-4725 wfroning@pacific.edu