From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 14:18:22 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE771065680
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2010 14:18:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CDC8FC1D
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2010 14:18:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E577722C508F;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 16:18:19 +0200 (EET)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:18:11 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
To: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100309161811.38eff62d@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <7be7a2801003090546p4f2433b6x343d6194c08c1a29@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7be7a2801003090546p4f2433b6x343d6194c08c1a29@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
	boundary="Sig_/c+1ghlqxWvk_Qd3GdG1YMA4";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should this line removed from Makefile?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:18:22 -0000

--Sig_/c+1ghlqxWvk_Qd3GdG1YMA4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:46:10 +0800
wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, all:
>=20
>    In www category, there are some ports with a line as:
> 1     @${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}
>=20
>    It always followed by this line:
> 2     @${ECHO_CMD} '@exec ${CHOWN} -R ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} ${WWWDIR}'
> >> ${TMPPLIST}
>=20
> while some other ports do not have line 2.
>=20
>    Is line 2 needed ? In my opion, line 2 changes nothing to
> ${TMPPLIST} in this case, so line 2 is not needed.
>=20
>    Any comment ?

If I'm reading this right, the first line applies when installing from
ports, while the second when installing from packages. So they are both
needed.

Should the installed files be owned by ${WWWOWN}:${WWWGRP} is an other
question (and I think this is unnecessarily for many ports/files/dirs).

--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B

--Sig_/c+1ghlqxWvk_Qd3GdG1YMA4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuWWKoACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeWeBACdFAXO9MUWBl2kjLKkF69xlC7v
ygkAoIMwm6rtiujnOiTqQlXCfcDicODQ
=eH1Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/c+1ghlqxWvk_Qd3GdG1YMA4--