From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Mar 8 15:27:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB8FAC308D; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from mail.ptrcrt.ch (gahr.cloud.tilaa.com [84.22.109.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E7930C; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from webmail.ptrcrt.ch (www.gahr.ch [192.168.1.2]) by mail.ptrcrt.ch (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7a72d8c9 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:27:49 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:27:48 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: wenheping , Alexey Dokuchaev , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: svn commit: r410453 - in head/math/fityk: . files In-Reply-To: <731F52BF0474DA3AD0CC4A5E@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <731F52BF0474DA3AD0CC4A5E@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: <7e7d04735f3c99081fd672ce35544382@gahr.ch> X-Sender: gahr@gahr.ch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:27:54 -0000 On 2016-03-08 16:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 8 mars 2016 16:06:59 +0100 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > | So, danfe@, would you mind explaining to me on which basis muting > MKDIRs > | is "at one's discretion" while muting INSTALLs is "actually wrong"? > | > | Given the evidence pointed at by mat@, either both muting MKDIR and > | INSTALL commands is at one's discretion, or neither is. > > Ok, the IMPORTANT bit here, is that the *install* phase is the most > important one from the end-user point of view. > > It's where things go live, and his system is modified. > > So we want to show up things thare are modifying his system. All of > them. > > Some argue that mkdir are not that important and can be muted, I kinda > disagree. > > And as the doc is how portmgr thinks things should be (in that case, > it's > been a couple of years where that means what *I* think), well, it's how > I > documented it. I completely agree with you. -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@gahr.ch PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp