From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Aug 18 9: 6:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from addr2.addr.com (addr.com [209.249.147.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708C037B42C; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from drnet.fais.net (drnet.fais.net [208.249.141.31]) by addr2.addr.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA61141; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:06:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwpauler@jwpages.com) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:05:24 -0500 (CDT) From: "Justin W. Pauler" X-Sender: jwpauler@drnet.fais.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Feature/Question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm BACK! Once again :P This time i'll try to keep it short, I promise... 1. FreeBSD Feature This is something I have been wondering about for awhile and just thought that it would be a nice feature. Its the output of 'mount'. I use it quite often to see what filesystems are mounted. Only problem is, well it gets kind of hard to read sometimes when you have several filesystems loaded. At times the lines can wrap around and can get pretty long. My suggesstion? Make the output something more like 'df'. In this scenario you would have a column for the slice, the mount point and then reads/writes, the file system and such. Having these multiple columns, would clean it up quite a bit. 2. Let me re-ask this question. Has anyone heard of an OPL-SAx soundcard driver? When I last asked this question someone said "it may be fixed by a cvsup". Uh-uh. No go. I have tried in the kernel just loading: device pcm device opl0 and this says, when it tries to link the kernel, something about undefined reference to opl.o, or thereabouts. I have also tried device pcm device snd device opl0 and this returns that it cannot load some type of midi source (or thereabouts). I have also tried without the 0, just 'opl' and it still gives me a problem. Can someone share some insight on this? 3. and finally, this might have been fixed, however, I am not sure so i'll ask anyways. Can we get the USB kernel module to load -without- the pseudo-device ether? I have -NO- ethernet cards in my system however, I have two usb ports. I would love to use usb without that extra psuedo-device. (Yes I know its picky, but...) When you attempt to use load usb, when linking the kernel it gives some junk about undefined reference from usb_ethersubr.o that it cannot find ether_input. This is then fixed when loading the psuedo device. Now, from what i understand, unless you need usb ehternet support, then it shouldnt load it right? Anyways, these are just some things I have come across. Hope you can help. --jwp Justin W. Pauler + Organization: JWPages Web Design + World Wide Web: http://www.jwpages.com/ + E-Mail: jwpauler@jwpages.com + Internet Relay Chat: drnet@undernet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message