Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:19 +0200 From: Damjan Marion <dmarion@FreeBSD.org> To: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> Cc: arm@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Customizing ubldr build... Message-ID: <8E4F983B-75F7-45DB-A92E-E66C721896E5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120524112546.bdef0c3c.ray@dlink.ua> References: <E84EA543-11A9-4EA6-9313-6908F485C569@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomyYPzqEJ86a6tfKSDeYrBqD21UDjefqyFNZC4yJ-pLWA@mail.gmail.com> <EBC5FF24-B1F5-43CD-AB1C-3BB659E8F5C6@freebsd.org> <B9008F20-E417-48BC-AAAC-8111A39B0A8B@FreeBSD.org> <20120524112546.bdef0c3c.ray@dlink.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200 > Damjan Marion <dmarion@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >>> On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot, >>>> so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot >>>> chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone. >>>=20 >>> What are the benefits of using ubldr compared to what we are doing >>> today(load; go)? >=20 > Preload modules for example. (if it accessible of course) I was looking into this few months ago but I didn't found a value in = doing this in embedded world where we already have custom kernel for each = SoC/board. Maybe we will have GENERIC arm kernel one day, but there is long = road.... Damjan=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E4F983B-75F7-45DB-A92E-E66C721896E5>