Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:46:12 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: koobs@FreeBSD.org, Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r386873 - head/security/ca_root_nss/files Message-ID: <555D5504.3030106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <555D4216.5060303@FreeBSD.org> References: <201505201808.t4KI8ajp012568@svn.freebsd.org> <555D4216.5060303@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/20/15 9:25 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 21/05/2015 4:08 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> Author: bjk (doc committer) >> Date: Wed May 20 18:08:35 2015 >> New Revision: 386873 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386873 >> >> Log: >> Fix spelling of "certification authority" >> >> Approved by: portmgr (bapt), bapt (ports committer) >> >> Modified: >> head/security/ca_root_nss/files/pkg-message.in >> > >> -FreeBSD does not, and can not warrant that the certificate authorities >> +FreeBSD does not, and can not warrant that the certification authorities >> whose certificates are included in this package have in any way been >> audited for trustworthiness or RFC 3647 compliance. > > FWIW, I intended certificate not certification, so not a spelling mistake. > > Though both are proper, I would asser the former feels more canonical: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority > > Not a biggy, just wanted to mention it. > I agree, Certificate seems more proper. Asking google shows far more hits for Certificate. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?555D5504.3030106>