From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Jan 30 5: 0:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A178737B401 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 05:00:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (esplanaden.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C13D43F3F for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 05:00:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0UD0ij1017614; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:00:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: docs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devfs(8) From: phk@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:56:00 -0200." <3E3920E0.7030508@tcoip.com.br> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:00:44 +0100 Message-ID: <17613.1043931644@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <3E3920E0.7030508@tcoip.com.br>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >It does not refer to devd(8). Shouldn't it? As it is, devfs(8) is only for manipulating the devfs rulesets, so I don't really think there is much interaction, but a cross-reference can never hurt on the general principle of "being the same sort of corner". -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message