From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Dec 1 19:50:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from router.hackerheaven.org (qn-213-73-194-22.quicknet.nl [213.73.194.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C206E37B417 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 19:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (tiamat.ipv6.hackerheaven.org [192.168.0.13]) by router.hackerheaven.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 762191CA3; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:50:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Emiel Kollof To: Alan Eldridge , FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: building as non-root Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 04:50:22 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20011201203004.A24482@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20011201203004.A24482@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20011202035008.762191CA3@router.hackerheaven.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:30, Alan Eldridge wrote: [fake root snip] Why not use a chrooted env? That's probably easier for packaging (since you don't have to "fake" the ports system). Heck, I bet you can use jails for that as well. Also, a rampant makefile can only wreck stuff in the chrooted env, so you have your protection. Or am I saying something completely stupid and outrageous here :-) Cheers, Emiel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message