From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 12 13:38:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B04737B405 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBCLbpZ02185; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:37:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200112122137.fBCLbpZ02185@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "George V. Neville-Neil" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone using USB cameras with FreeBSD 4.4? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:14:03 PST." <200112120114.RAA597323@meer.meer.net> From: dochawk@psu.edu Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:37:51 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG george gyrated, > I'm thinking of getting one but don't want to plunk down the $ > until I know it will work. some as mass storage devices, some under gphoto, and many more under gphoto2. The good news is that my JamCam is supported under gphoto2. The bad news is that it's still a jamcam, and sucks. Picture quality ranges from fair (moderately lit indoors) to bad (dim or bright indoors, moderate outdoors) to un believably bad bright outdoors, among others. I assumed it would be comparable to the original 100 model apple. not even close . . . hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message