Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:32:43 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   cc taking a signal 11
Message-ID:  <199912201632.LAA01647@bb01f39.unx.sas.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help 

Hi,

   While I'm at it, a co-worker gave this one to me earlier today.

   cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11

   4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Dec 20 01:45:25 EST 1999



FreeBSD(root)/tmp %cc -v
Using builtin specs.
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

FreeBSD(root)/tmp %cc -O foo.c -o foo.o -c
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11



static void getsig11(parfree,dbl,lambda)
 long parfree;
 double *dbl;
 double *lambda;
{
    long i, j;
    j = -1;
    for(i = 0; i < parfree; i++)  {
       j += i+1;
       dbl[j] *= (1.0 + *lambda);
       }
    return;
}


   Yes, the algorithm looks funny, but is correct. The program will
compile correctly if the 'j += i+1;' is changed to 'j = i+1;' or if
the variable 'lambda' is changed from a pointer to an actual value.

   Anyone want to take a stab at this? I'm not a big compiler
person myself... (Dave, you there?).

Thanks,
John


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912201632.LAA01647>