From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 00:47:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D00FB41; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmta1.delivery4.ore.mailhop.org (pmta1.delivery4.ore.mailhop.org [54.191.151.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACB47B4; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.ore.mailhop.org (172.31.18.134) by pmta1.delivery1.ore.mailhop.org id hrl4pm20r841; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:47:21 +0000 (envelope-from ) Received: from [73.34.117.227] (helo=ilsoft.org) by smtp4.ore.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YM4Po-0003dX-7u; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:47:28 +0000 Received: from revolution.hippie.lan (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1D0lRTD001058; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:47:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP X-Originating-IP: 73.34.117.227 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@duocircle.com (see https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+BcAd9SN1/fn9jkuYZ7v54 Message-ID: <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make From: Ian Lepore To: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:47:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net> <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.8 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:47:30 -0000 On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha= > > > t I > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old = > > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > make > > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > > > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Bapt > > > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to > > remove old make without notice ? > > > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and that > is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11) > > Best regards, > Bapt fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it? That's what I vaguely remember as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but available as a port. -- Ian