From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 15:13:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0B916A418; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025F613C46A; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from scoo-longs-computer.local (74-92-209-69-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [74.92.209.69] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1IFDKtl013565; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:13:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <47B9A08F.4080703@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:13:19 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Penisoara References: <200802181414.m1IEE8bd075081@drugs.dv.isc.org> <78cb3d3f0802180632u1d38ec67i432052d9c77dd706@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0802180632u1d38ec67i432052d9c77dd706@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.4 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to take down a system to the point of requiring a newfs with one line of C (userland) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:13:31 -0000 Adrian Penisoara wrote: > Hi, > > I would agree with Mark and Jim, this is a serious issue for enterprise > servers. Yet another example where I would have wanted to see a more > supportive response from the FreeBSD project members, like Robert Watson > just did. This would benefit keeping a good relation with the business > users. > The responses from Dag-Erling was pretty much what I'd expect to see on a linux mailing list. Hopefully this filesystem issue gets some attention. Scott