From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Sep 23 18:13:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBC837B42C; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e8O1DbQ62297; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:13:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <39CD5541.C565AE35@thehousleys.net> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:13:37 -0400 From: James Housley Organization: The Housleys dot Net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ade Lovett , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build of latest pan fails References: <20000924010847.A253@parish> <20000923195729.E322@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ade Lovett wrote: > just fine, and I'll feel a lot better. (You'll notice that bento, > which uses 1.2.8, seems to have no problem building this package, > always a good first step to check before having a problem with something). > It's onigiri now and not bento. But more importantly. In all the times I have read the Porter's Handbook, I don't remember seeing any reference to check http://onigiri.freebsd.org/errorlogs as part of the ongoing maintance of submitted ports. Especially about 1 week after it has been commited into the tree. Did I miss this or should I submit a patch? Jim -- "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines" -- Anon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message