From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 18:06:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CDF16A420 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476EA43D70 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:06:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k27I68IB024881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:06:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id k27I68uW024880; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:06:08 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:06:08 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Christopher McGee Message-ID: <20060307180608.GP1102@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , Christopher McGee , Yar Tikhiy , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org References: <440876F1.6050804@xecu.net> <20060304211526.GD3304@comp.chem.msu.su> <440C6A5C.2030003@xecu.net> <20060306184731.GD53752@comp.chem.msu.su> <440C8F7C.6070201@xecu.net> <20060306213415.GA61210@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060306215824.GA1102@cell.sick.ru> <440DC036.3050009@xecu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <440DC036.3050009@xecu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Yar Tikhiy , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Carp on vlan with em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:06:38 -0000 On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:17:42PM -0500, Christopher McGee wrote: C> Since 6.x is only a .0 I have been reluctant to make a switch for C> production machines. The machines that this is required for are C> redundant firewalls. They have the availability to push a full gigabit, C> will I run into any throughput problems or any other potential problems C> with 6.x? 6.x forwards IP traffic better than 5.x do. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE