From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 15 2:41:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E84215726 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:41:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14438; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:39:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Stephen McKay Cc: Luoqi Chen , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Apr 1999 19:21:26 +1000." <199904150921.TAA28780@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:39:05 -0700 Message-ID: <14436.924169145@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Now, what are the chances that FreeBSD Inc could purchase the services > of Mindcraft to test a properly tuned FreeBSD box vs this NT box? And what are the chances that anyone would trust the results of this test after what they did to Linux and Novell? :) Seems to me like it would be a waste of the kind of money they're likely to charge (and if it were anything less than $10K, I'd be amazed). - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message