From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  9 19:03:22 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E530210657F2;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2008 19:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@fer.hr)
Received: from xaqua.tel.fer.hr (xaqua.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17AF8FC24;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2008 19:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@fer.hr)
Received: by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix, from userid 20006)
	id ED0CD9B64A; Mon,  9 Jun 2008 20:46:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on xaqua.tel.fer.hr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [192.168.200.111] (zec2.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.79])
	by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48009B644;
	Mon,  9 Jun 2008 20:46:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marko Zec <zec@fer.hr>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 20:46:02 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <484CC690.9020303@elischer.org> <484CFE6E.7040305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <484CFE6E.7040305@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200806092046.02847.zec@fer.hr>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:09:43 +0000
Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org,
	FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: kinda headsup..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:03:23 -0000

On Monday 09 June 2008 11:57:02 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > At the BSDCAn devsummit we discussed how to proceed with committing
> > Vimage to -current.
> >
> > the Milestones included something like:
> >
> > June 8 (today) Headsup....
> >
> > June 15        commit changes that add macros for vnet
> >                (network module) and vinet(inet virtualisation)
> >                with macros defined in such a way to make 0 actual
> >                differences. provable by md5 etc.
> >                Documentat
> >                  s/hostname/g//V_hostname/
> >                  #define V_hostname hostname
> >                2 weeks settle time, next step prepared, tested
> >                and reviewed.
>
> ...
>
> > diffs can be found at:
> >  http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/vimage.diff and it are usually
> > fairly up to date.
>
> Did Marko fix the panic I saw back in May?  I wasn't even able to
> boot a vimage kernel yet, let alone begin testing it :)

I just submitted a p4 change that allows for a machine to boot with 
rpc.lockd enabled, but haven't tested it with any NFS mounts yet.  But 
do you really need to have rpc.lockd running to be able to do any 
testing?

Pls. note that the vimage branch tracking HEAD has other misterious 
lockups that I haven't been able to track down yet.  The 
user/zec/vimage_7 branch is in much better shape...

Marko