From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 21:15:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2152A1065695; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:548a::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B487E8FC19; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA030126; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:15:53 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on muon.cran.org.uk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Received: from tau.draftnet (tau.demon.co.uk [80.177.26.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:15:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:15:32 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20080928221532.0e692490@tau.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20080928054620.GA80250@k7.mavetju> References: <20080928054620.GA80250@k7.mavetju> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for testing - top 3.8b1 in the base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:15:57 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:46:20 +1000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > I have made an update for the top(1) utility in the FreeBSD base > system to get it from the 3.5b12 version to the 3.8b1 version. > [...] > Please report any issues with it (compile time, run time) and a way > to reproduce it (if possible). Thanks for your help! > There are some new warnings generated during compilation with WARNS=1 due to the use of -DSIGWINCH on the command line (since it has already been defined in signal.h). Though of course it doesn't have any effect on the functionality. -- Bruce Cran