From nobody Sat Oct 9 14:17:07 2021
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B4412D95C2;
Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:17:17 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from felix@palmen-it.de)
Received: from stef.palmen-it.de (stef.palmen-it.de [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:bbb:1::1])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HRRvw1xm1z4tKg;
Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from felix@palmen-it.de)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=palmen-it.de; s=20200414; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=jharVNuHwpK25h4wzal6u5cJNDfBqx8ZGuEqOFMvOtY=; b=SaJ7GP5FTK0cBtmxYMi7QVQ33K
59Hapy2Kp4omMutm33MoNsc2+zUr3BMyqNiCyTXq1c6nb0n9XN9uTvpprNt0Luo3Bz0Z2wSPugvDf
9Y3SAe1j6FTN/pAmTigJuIY6iNK9CXGZ2Hrs1Zqv6GJ0r9QMRZdjqp0i8wIhBc+V0rTArv6pvbxX+
gRV715Eau/OR96MrzOSQsHEEwtEaBVFyF/6wGgSwvtv50Uq0Iia/ku0nv2aYYOyBwkAfTWUQpKHHj
tfWxtSAmr02+WOpB26e42w4lQtv6JqCNIA7ATA/nPIfGzJ2xmkePIZAhVjq9y/gNudcHrodZ/whs/
jEW/Ffdg==;
Received: from [192.168.71.101] (helo=mail.home.palmen-it.de)
by stef.palmen-it.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <felix@palmen-it.de>)
id 1mZD9x-002nEK-BR; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 16:17:09 +0200
Received: from nexus.home.palmen-it.de ([192.168.99.2])
by mail.home.palmen-it.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
(Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from <felix@palmen-it.de>)
id 1mZD9w-000IZj-St; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 14:17:08 +0000
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 16:17:07 +0200
From: Felix Palmen <felix@palmen-it.de>
To: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: State of LibreSSL in FreeBSD ports
Message-ID: <20211009141707.oicjg54owee5wfz2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de>
Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Face: /1K@t"h.}e~pR@]c7HorQ!T`F^RJ<!xiU\\+>Ca'BCr#e>IKA{>C/9OTGB4|xh"y2{?1Z5M
i2w"AH^pN_LlHR^{+f',_Np~;.B;!M/bL}*qk]p5*r7F5vW};{:@4u5S?T&f0$7BJ-71Q5SV]:v$`5
A0[DZ:=?S52x8HJ~5@^P_\T@MsjG{R(
Organization: palmen-it.de
References: <20211003141654.bwlnlin6g3s2n5gt@nexus.home.palmen-it.de>
<20211004182033.7iaeak3z2dgwdbhw@aching.in.mat.cc>
<20211005063849.zjejmnaifve4gngz@nexus.home.palmen-it.de>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6xuq25yiix6s5q7n"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211005063849.zjejmnaifve4gngz@nexus.home.palmen-it.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20210205
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HRRvw1xm1z4tKg
X-Spamd-Bar: --------
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
dkim=pass header.d=palmen-it.de header.s=20200414 header.b=SaJ7GP5F;
dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=palmen-it.de;
spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of felix@palmen-it.de designates 2001:470:1f0b:bbb:1::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=felix@palmen-it.de
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.80 / 15.00];
RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
ARC_NA(0.00)[];
R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[palmen-it.de:s=20200414];
NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000];
FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[palmen-it.de:dkim];
TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:1f0b:bbb:1::1];
MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain];
TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[];
HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[];
RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[];
DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[palmen-it.de:+];
RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[palmen-it.de,none];
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2001:470:1f0b:bbb:1::1:from];
NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000];
SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[];
NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000];
FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~];
ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US];
RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N
--6xuq25yiix6s5q7n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Felix Palmen <felix@palmen-it.de> [20211005 08:38]:
> If that would be consensus, I think it would be better to remove the
> option altogether. What's the point of having a totally unsupported and
> experimental option in ports anyways?
To get that straight, I think a decision is needed here.
Either libressl in ports is supported, IMHO, that would mean:
* try to push necessary patches upstream
* if that's not possible, maintain them locally
* if that's not possible (e.g. because the patch is really intrusive and
needs to change all the time), mark the port BROKEN/IGNORE with
libressl
* It's never ok to have a build failure
OR libressl is *not* supported, then I really think it should be removed
=66rom DEFAULT_VERSIONS.
--=20
Dipl.-Inform. Felix Palmen <felix@palmen-it.de> ,.//..........
{web} http://palmen-it.de {jabber} [see email] ,//palmen-it.de
{pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt // """""""""""
{pgp fingerprint} A891 3D55 5F2E 3A74 3965 B997 3EF2 8B0A BC02 DA2A
--6xuq25yiix6s5q7n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEqJE9VV8uOnQ5ZbmXPvKLCrwC2ioFAmFhpFoACgkQPvKLCrwC
2iq+eQgAh5tbc13Q41b2fC9H6l/IcuypEl04oc3NXbsbAjCUL++0P3qPWjE0yhjd
+d2/+cOWISBnKLkAbFIJW/sFdRfYN4+3X/WRoPJ2np/Iz5InibQ0f2Ewk6aYshKM
OfhlhYAmWCz9Zz4Y5kMTxWRdLrcuiI5bjRO69K7Lafdo7mvs3oiiFILWqtUrFZDo
FyQjSy+VRxI3vK38AJS7tgd/c9QUQY5FMAbsjRWgj7jB8s9OCVAWToPh6qi8ZWGW
laem65O+FmtHVLBG9beP9uj2Fnas/w0ptOyVX6rAtZXwNBvRoylrzSQcIKBdryyo
E9rkpeuN3mO+T8l5DRHIhD7aqLkJow==
=0zHU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6xuq25yiix6s5q7n--