From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Dec 8 18:22:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC4B1ED07E for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47WF6T2TsJz3DTL for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 374E81ED07A; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3718A1ED079 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47WF6S5dp2z3DTD for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC96664E4 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xB8IMOn9031853 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xB8IMOOG031796 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 18:22:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241101] i915kms working with 12.0 but not 12.1-BETA3 Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 18:22:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tomek@cedro.info X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 18:22:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241101 --- Comment #14 from Tomasz "CeDeROM" CEDRO --- Hey Niclas :-) My "not fixed" was response to Vincent DEFERT 2019-11-04 19:32:26 UTC / Status: New =E2=86=92 Closed / Resolution: --- =E2=86=92 FIXED. > No one has claimed this has been fixed. Byt keeping track of which ports > need to be installed from ports, and which from packages, must be done by > the person administrating the system. Negative. Providing malicious PKG that WILL CRASH the system and lead to DESTROY ITS DATA is the responsibility of the package creator, committer and maintainer. Also the FreeBSD Core Team NOT to allow such situation to happe= n. If there is such _risk_ it should not land in production/release! Now we ha= ve such _existing_situation_ in the production systems! Really not cool :-( User / Admin hits the `pkg update upgrade` on a _PRODUCTION_ system with an official production packages so it gets a production system updated and working. We cannot get with FreeBSD to a Linux mindset where user needs to perform additional 472847824 tasks to make things work. It never happened before an= d I really hope it never will. > I would also like to ask a question, how would you go about this? The answer is above. The situation should never happen. Do not push the bleeding edge into the production. Block all known issues in a way they wou= ld not happen on a production system. 1. Remove DRM-KMOD out of PKG at all until there is a working solution. Lea= ving it in PKG causes production systems to crash. What more evidence do you nee= d? 2. Do not allow Linux like programming where API changes from release to release into FreeBSD Kernel. I am sure most users are good to wait for qual= ity code rather than bleeding edge Kernel. We avoid Linux for that reason. Cheers :-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=