From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 25 12:30:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E47816A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298E243D1D for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5PCUPwS056464 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5PCUPnA056462; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:25 GMT Message-Id: <200406251230.i5PCUPnA056462@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Cyril Guibourg Subject: Fwd: Re: ports/68281: add SPF support for milter-greylist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cyril Guibourg List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:30:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/68281; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cyril Guibourg To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: Re: ports/68281: add SPF support for milter-greylist Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:21:53 +0200 Something went wrong when replying, not sure it reached all recipients. -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- To: ports@freebsd.org From: Cyril Guibourg Organization: Home sweet home Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:01:45 +0200 Subject: Re: ports/68281: add SPF support for milter-greylist Hello Hajimu, Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: >>Description: > Though milter-greylist supports SPF but the port doesn't. Yep, it was on my todo list :) >>How-To-Repeat: > building ports/mail/milter-greylist > >>Fix: > Following patch added two options; WITH_SPF and WITH_SPF_ALT. > WITH_SPF uses libspf and WITH_SPF_ALT uses libspf-alt. I've been told that libspf_alt needs a reentrant version of libbind in order to work fine. Are the available res_* libc routines thread safe ? Thanks. -------------------- End of forwarded message --------------------