Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:37:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r431156 - in head/www: . miniminiweb Message-ID: <20170111133702.GA36222@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201701110304.v0B34f5u031359@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201701110304.v0B34f5u031359@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:04:41AM +0000, Larry Rosenman wrote: > New Revision: 431156 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/431156 > > Log: > New Port www/miniminiweb > > MiniMiniWeb is my attempt at creating a multithreaded web server in C. > > Features (and Misfeatures) > > Written in C > Multithreaded (with pthread) > Designed for Unix-like systems > Supports GET and POST requests > Only serves static files > No SSL > No CGI or anything "dynamic" > No Virtual Hosts > No Directory Listings (gotten pulled out) > No IPv6 May I ask what makes it useful to be included in the Ports Collection? There're plenty of different production-quality webservers already available, and mind that we don't just go and port whatever project we find on GitHub without sufficiently strong rationale. Neither port's description nor PR did answer this question. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170111133702.GA36222>