From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 21:11:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B9C16A41F; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EBA43D46; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:11:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ikaros.oook.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8KLBGXl074142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:11:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by ikaros.oook.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8KLBGHs074141; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:11:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ikaros.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Clint Olsen In-Reply-To: <43307999.9030802@0lsen.net> References: <20050920204941.GA73621@0lsen.net> <1127249597.66767.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <43307999.9030802@0lsen.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LNW8umu+YjwwLQqAugPv" Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:11:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1127250675.66767.12.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, mbr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devel/fam missing boot (rc.d/fam.sh)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:11:21 -0000 --=-LNW8umu+YjwwLQqAugPv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Clint Olsen p=ED=B9e v =FAt 20. 09. 2005 v 14:05 -0700: > Thanks for the hint. However, since this was installed as a=20 > prerequisite for the GNOME operating system (via portinstall), are we=20 > supposed to examine every dependent package's pkg-message to find out=20 > what we missed? >=20 > It would seem like you would want it to install it in one form or=20 > another and allow the user to change it if that's not the preferred=20 > method. At least in that case you get a working daemon out of the box.=20 > It seems to jive with spirit of the more automated portinstall method. When gnome2 port is finished installing, it prints a short message containing http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/ link. If you go there and click FAQ, one of the entry deals with FAM and points to that pkg-message. Yes it's a bit cumbersome. We (FreeBSE GNOME Team) is hoping to move soon to gamin, an alternative fam implementation, which works out of the box. --=20 Pav Lucistnik And now something completely different. --=-LNW8umu+YjwwLQqAugPv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDMHrzntdYP8FOsoIRApKgAKC+wmV94ghqnKZkSXS+BgSTe8pTWACfbQd+ lKUOzzi+BZPWnstRWurpG/A= =XDZN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LNW8umu+YjwwLQqAugPv--