From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 19:04:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620A0106566B for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7F88FC0A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggki1 with SMTP id i1so4294326ggk.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:04:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2VnhrKH2Inpdr4fbAVNIhkw+qSFYbEE00Owmr98EXWc=; b=mtOhsMRJrffPsnj3PyPUubGk0Ebc2ACufe4keKeoID4B5Am7mvFg3lTODOdKQnhQMk knE/3UVXUSRYNuqqRp2iR+jU06bHCMH8WUp4W7eFuRotA21+UAocZPYJahs3O3lwTAsr X+OoYIvXpcKy8STRW+JxJweYNKzjcShq9rkzo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.193.229 with SMTP id hr5mr18875229igc.15.1326827082288; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:04:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120117184322.GA19794@hemlock.hydra> References: <201201162339.q0GNdG1V064832@anthesphoria.net> <4F1561FE.5080801@gmail.com> <4F15C010.6010707@FreeBSD.org> <20120117184322.GA19794@hemlock.hydra> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:04:42 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Chad Perrin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding licensing info to my ports: some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:04:43 -0000 On 17 Jan 2012 18:43, "Chad Perrin" wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:38:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 01/17/2012 03:56, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > > > Eitan Adler wrote: > > >>> 1) Will licensing section ever appear in the Porters Handbook? :-) > > >> > > >> Yes > > > > > > Is someone actually working on it? If so, and is there some sort of > > > target timeline? > > > > > > Back in 2010 when the framework was introduced, my general impression > > > was that maintainers where advised to wait with the adoption until that > > > chapter is written... > > > > Personally I think we should scrap the whole thing. It is an interesting > > idea, but the implementation has never fleshed out. It's also completely > > unclear what any of it means from an actual legal standpoint, and > > personally I'm not convinced that we aren't making things worse for the > > project by doing this. > > How? I don't see the problem that makes things worse, I guess. Well... the author and maintainer of the code isn't around any more. Chris