Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 07:27:20 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: coolvibe@hackerheaven.org (Emiel Kollof) Cc: alane@geeksrus.net, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: building as non-root Message-ID: <200112020427.HAA11468@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <20011202035008.762191CA3@router.hackerheaven.org> from "Emiel Kollof" at "Dec 2, 1 04:50:22 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emiel Kollof writes: > On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:30, Alan Eldridge wrote: > [fake root snip] > > Why not use a chrooted env? That's probably easier for packaging (since you > don't have to "fake" the ports system). Heck, I bet you can use jails for > that as well. Also, a rampant makefile can only wreck stuff in the chrooted > env, so you have your protection. chrooted env usually installed by for example make installworld DESTDIR=/somejailorchroot To install ports in jail or chroot much work to tune need: mount /usr/ports, /usr/ports/distfiles so on. There is much difference beetween for i in /jail/1 /jail/2 ..... ;do make reinstall DESTDIR=$i done and establish every /jail (or chroot) been able build/install port More of, such tuning of running jail is not desireable sometimes. > Or am I saying something completely stupid and outrageous here :-) > > Cheers, > Emiel -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112020427.HAA11468>