From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jan 10 02:08:24 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA27247
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 02:08:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA27241;
          Sun, 10 Jan 1999 02:08:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA05790;
	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 21:07:34 +1100
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 21:07:34 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199901101007.VAA05790@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, mike@smith.net.au
Subject: Re: sysctl's as an FS
Cc: abial@nask.pl, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> I think it was a mistake to have a separate namespace and interfaces for
>> sysctls, but this is hard to change now.
>
>Which namespace would you have preferred?

Filesystem.  It's the only ASCII namespace.  Who would prefer anything else?

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message