Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:04:18 +0100 From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Django versions Message-ID: <8ea7382b-07bd-5f5f-7eb3-ede21651795b@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <08b8a053-50d9-f618-643b-26003171e923@FreeBSD.org> References: <bb5ad8a6-8786-c115-389c-f6034f860cf3@freebsd.org> <CAALwa8kro_R4f=Ut0Eb_6=6d9AL=c-TrfCZD=_tP7ia56Akzwg@mail.gmail.com> <08b8a053-50d9-f618-643b-26003171e923@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nQfpweypBitrLNkyqY0cU6RxNuEiayBa2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="egpbmjXXArsuab1TXfXnYQtIc38bCc0Oy"; protected-headers="v1" From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8ea7382b-07bd-5f5f-7eb3-ede21651795b@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Django versions References: <bb5ad8a6-8786-c115-389c-f6034f860cf3@freebsd.org> <CAALwa8kro_R4f=Ut0Eb_6=6d9AL=c-TrfCZD=_tP7ia56Akzwg@mail.gmail.com> <08b8a053-50d9-f618-643b-26003171e923@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <08b8a053-50d9-f618-643b-26003171e923@FreeBSD.org> --egpbmjXXArsuab1TXfXnYQtIc38bCc0Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 07.03.19 um 09:02 schrieb Matthew Seaman: > On 07/03/2019 07:22, Antoine Brodin wrote: >> Please don't use the django metaport, this port should be removed and= >> people should stop using hacks. >> Someone needs to integrate a USE_PYTHON=3Ddjango in python.mk >=20 > Let me look at that. I never did like leaving D12592 so unresolved. >=20 > Although it would be good to have a more general solution to > multiple-flavourization. If anything in that direction is discussed, then please include me in the thread (since I do read the list, but I'm not able to follow it closely, currently). I had asked about multi-flavour support nearly one-and-a-half year ago and I was told that lack of support for more than one flavour was by design and considered to be the correct concept. There are quite a number of other weaknesses in the way flavours are currently implemented (and it cost me a lot of effort to work around them, when I took over maintainer-ship of portmaster to make it support flavours). I had given up trying top get this fixed, but it may be the right time (given some experience with flavoured ports) to reconsider some of the design and implementation choices made ... Regards, STefan --egpbmjXXArsuab1TXfXnYQtIc38bCc0Oy-- --nQfpweypBitrLNkyqY0cU6RxNuEiayBa2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEo3HqZZwL7MgrcVMTR+u171r99UQFAlyA3pMACgkQR+u171r9 9UT/zgf5AdGWbKCbeFmlpdVPEz0L8z/tQnOkfDGlXHt8ZPytZ7pQjSXZ2gg3a3nj XUjHknqZ2qFu+LUcz85fSisUuTKbIevDr3R7NLeyJYEKeGUQh305YZhIa6QnEO3X 2u4YPMUN2UKtmt3ABT2zxFfi9bu7yJD58bE6qTgoV9mIfS0EnYjcskczXMO9UJuw esIzXlaEH3VIk/Sn2sH6BrFCbN+0v6U8BurBMuaSeuUdX+VIzhOj9xtMV6AL51cL 5YnCobvdMopwJ+ow4IhCDyWFA/2oyAhVL3GEbffUj9sNsNcWugRkGUUToLD6Ocqd s+TUB8gjUlt262mYcQxqYaIciaJ8kQ== =8Cl6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nQfpweypBitrLNkyqY0cU6RxNuEiayBa2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8ea7382b-07bd-5f5f-7eb3-ede21651795b>