From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 15:05:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7301B1065673 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E962F8FC16 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M8xtE-0006Sb-MW for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:29 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:28 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:28 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:44:23 +0200 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Sender: news Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Francisco Cabrita wrote: > Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the vo= lumes > are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very > granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a= NTFS > volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under FreeB= SD) No, and it wouldn't be of any use to you since Samba would still see it as a POSIX file system. OTOH, Samba has some rudimentary support for ACLs (it's a built-time option) and UFS2 has ACL support by default, though it needs to be enabled in fstab (see mount(8)), so depending on how convoluted are your requirements, it might or might not work. See for example: http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/ --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkocAEcACgkQldnAQVacBchc5ACg9Te9NSuTeFKq56ZVtjqPhYu8 6OYAoIHB5L1LNGBEaDQFYU37BlImTjCw =h4rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA--