From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 27 11:48:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from angel.double-barrel.be (mail.double-barrel.be [194.7.102.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B9D15992 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 11:48:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvergall@double-barrel.be) Received: from ws3.double-barrel.be (ws3.double-barrel.be [194.7.102.30]) by angel.double-barrel.be (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA15708; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:47:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (mvergall@localhost) by ws3.double-barrel.be (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA08042; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:47:28 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: ws3.double-barrel.be: mvergall owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 20:47:28 +0200 (CEST) From: "Michael C. Vergallen" To: Spidey Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 May 1999, Spidey wrote: > [useless comment] > > I don't understand why there's always someone coming up and saying > something like "FreeBSD broke my fan" or "FBSD is unstable". Exactly... The systems I have here do their jobs very well.. one quam I do have is that the SMP (stable as a rock) is a bit slugish do..this is because most apps do not yet take advantage of the threading of processes for the rest it has a uptime of about 90 days... Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message