Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:21:17 +0100
From:      Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
To:        Jim Harris <jim.harris@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable Users <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Strange CAM errors
Message-ID:  <50CF9ADD.7080202@digiware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CAJP=Hc-4mjWON5=Qi=WVzZ_wzGzz06MjX6w9S5t=xFfyAQ7jbA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <50CEFAC5.8000002@digiware.nl> <572946ED30FA47C69D6DCDD511CF6EB2@multiplay.co.uk> <50CF47A5.4090008@digiware.nl> <CAJP=Hc9q50qe4tXxmek_ZD6j=1CNQFwiO9XxtniOLdHZz6gWxw@mail.gmail.com> <50CF925C.5040106@digiware.nl> <CAJP=Hc-4mjWON5=Qi=WVzZ_wzGzz06MjX6w9S5t=xFfyAQ7jbA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17-12-2012 23:10, Jim Harris wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl
> <mailto:wjw@digiware.nl>> wrote:
> 
>     On 17-12-2012 20:16, Jim Harris wrote:>
>     > The timeouts are occurring on inquiry commands to non-zero LUNs.
>     > arcmsr(4) is returning CAM_SEL_TIMEOUT instead of
>     CAM_DEV_NOT_THERE for
>     > inquiry commands to this device and LUN > 0.  CAM_DEV_NOT_THERE is
>     > preferred to remove these types of warnings, and similar patches have
>     > gone into for other SCSI drivers recently.
>     >
>     > Can you try this patch?
>     >
>     > Index: sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.c
>     > ===================================================================
>     > --- sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.c     (revision 244190)
>     > +++ sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.c     (working copy)
>     > @@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@
>     >                 char *buffer=pccb->csio.data_ptr;
>     >
>     >                 if (pccb->ccb_h.target_lun) {
>     > -                       pccb->ccb_h.status |= CAM_SEL_TIMEOUT;
>     > +                       pccb->ccb_h.status |= CAM_DEV_NOT_THERE;
>     >                         xpt_done(pccb);
>     >                         return;
>     >                 }
>     >
> 
>     Hi Jim,
> 
>     The noise has gone down by a factor of 5, now I get:
> 
>     (probe6:arcmsr0:0:16:1): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 20 0 0 24 0
>     (probe6:arcmsr0:0:16:1): CAM status: Unable to terminate I/O CCB request
>     (probe6:arcmsr0:0:16:1): Error 5, Unretryable error
>     (probe6:arcmsr0:0:16:2): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 40 0 0 24 0
> 
>     Which is defined in sys/cam/cam.c ....
>     as CAM_UA_TERMIO, but that error is nowhere set in the arcmsr code....
> 
> 
> There is something out of sync on your system.  I just noticed this, but
> your original error messages were showing "Command timeout"
> (CAM_CMD_TIMEOUT) even though the driver was returning CAM_SEL_TIMEOUT. 
> Now in this case, driver is returning CAM_DEV_NOT_THERE, but CAM is
> printing error message for CAM_UA_TERMIO.  In both cases, driver is
> returning value X, but cam is interpreting it as X+1.  So CAM and
> arcmsr(4) seem to have a different idea of the values of the cam_status
> enumeration.
> 
> Can you provide details on your build environment?  Are you building
> arcmsr as a loadable module or do you specify "device arcmsr" in your
> kernel config to link it statically?  I'm suspecting loadable module,
> although I have no idea how these values would get out of sync since
> this enumeration hasn't changed in probably 10+ years.

arcmsr is build in the kernel

[/usr/src] wjw@zfs.digiware.nl> kldstat
Id Refs Address            Size     Name
 1   28 0xffffffff80200000 b55be0   kernel
 2    1 0xffffffff80d56000 6138     nullfs.ko
 3    1 0xffffffff80d5d000 2153b0   zfs.ko
 4    2 0xffffffff80f73000 5e38     opensolaris.ko
 5    1 0xffffffff80f79000 f510     aio.ko
 6    1 0xffffffff80f89000 2a20     coretemp.ko
 7    1 0xffffffff81012000 316d4    nfscl.ko
 8    2 0xffffffff81044000 10827    nfscommon.ko

And I just refetched 9.1-PRERELEASE this afternoon over svn....

Could this have something to do with Clang <> gcc ????
Not that I did anything to change this.

Note that I have nothing changed other than the KERNEL CONFIG file.

And both kernel and world were build at the same time this afternoon.
With your patch I just only rebuild kernel and modules.

--WjW




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50CF9ADD.7080202>