From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 16:51:37 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9431023E56; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackagadget@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD67184B29; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hackagadget@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id t133-v6so3531348oif.10; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:51:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q6tG6a444d+qn3AsU7UbjZRfXPHjnqhG7U0TRamHXaY=; b=q43QYXyplWhaRDBDBBrMXVfh6rGYc7tqcYHIf6xfEOZJT0QZ56Es+bKzjMjr2XtrDU 8IXrR2uGMpgaXhRoKvsoKCEhfc4zbHDt9ncB+6uAsBR9Khxi+cV/OLrzQ+20PTWF0z0F 0e06QZT/9RYbZfg3tTtVj6dsLIpjiVftBDrCNMK74rOPCYKbToDSm8pBaq6rINwj7jyk ZjhdqMe47XJOIKLsq2r7IPwpqA0LeXxTgW19GakihYgr2jp7J8FIxfpjJzrU6boYQ0hW N4XERnEZLLx+ggpV07xmuXpfiQ/i9+KMGziLKKSen7+xLZ3JRHxIlc9OS6urBfosIZ0O L9rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q6tG6a444d+qn3AsU7UbjZRfXPHjnqhG7U0TRamHXaY=; b=cStjac0O/dX3UWZ6eml6yyU7YC/aB+bk7RCHi+qJqjS+MqdXPL0sqgstAw5K4ep5Nb iSdwmovO8ZkP5fC1Wy+HSG9WNcKiEe3nO69Bm7r0rWkNAhdgFoEP2eJfptsJnbhlGD7x y66QZYGIPeICTGklMSKdVOL7Z0k/FPYHOStnizFnj+MKp8j6SeMRY3ETwMHFouDdc0px Th8OF2zosrt7vaIwkabp0Os5DoSVyODyGEY80YvRohUDnA9ihlHpDJ22BXOx1YjHt7qe NcBcC35kXgGjkFaSkVPnFeHPbSoJFdgh+acb5ti6cyzrL1rIMET0yUqLp1nAy+KrCO2D sq4g== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0uha0BQlc0WCM2MYwJvwxl/5Zvu9AZAzvJ54e5oIgDTsie3t3d i2cutUsTr1XrHf/U57mVeExB66tDVyASRCaTCwA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKJZtG+cf6WNtP83EZlTTkfICgux5Lfn5V6jixUk4CY9CUfkwKE1aO2OBfUsVVzYcMz5QP2LL22opxOsviuhmY= X-Received: by 2002:aca:51cb:: with SMTP id f194-v6mr15805955oib.110.1529599895749; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:51:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:1918:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:51:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201806200108.w5K18sIR050132@repo.freebsd.org> From: Stephen Kiernan Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:51:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r335402 - head/sbin/veriexecctl To: Eitan Adler Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:51:37 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:36 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 19 June 2018 at 20:08, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 19 June 2018 at 18:08, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: > >> Added: head/sbin/veriexecctl/Makefile > >> ============================================================ > ================== > >> --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) > >> +++ head/sbin/veriexecctl/Makefile Wed Jun 20 01:08:54 2018 > (r335402) > >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > >> +# $FreeBSD$ > >> + > >> +PROG= veriexecctl > >> +MAN= veriexecctl.8 > >> +SRCS= veriexecctl_parse.y veriexecctl_conf.l veriexecctl.c > >> + > >> +WARNS?= 3 > > > > Why are we introducing new code with lower-than-6 warnings ? > > In all the commotion about the more important issues this fell > through. Also its argument parsing appears to not be using > getopt[_long] ? > I replied to this 2 days ago with: "veriexecctl came from NetBSD originally and that is what they had, but I believe it should be able to be bumped up." However, there has been some discussion about just not putting in veriexecctl for now and wait for some work that Simon Gerraty has been doing, using some of the work for the verified loader, instead. However, it would also mean that in the meantime, there would be nothing available to be able to people to try out veriexec to provide some feedback until that utility was completed and committed. -Steve