Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:51:35 -0700
From:      Stephen Kiernan <hackagadget@gmail.com>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r335402 - head/sbin/veriexecctl
Message-ID:  <CAEm%2B2uUfBefgHWW4WRxbS0KYSnk1FY_j28H9pTOGWhp4GoSREw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmoi=sEoQyHYr=E8syBgX7au%2BvMmk34L-VfG_sZOMeTyg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201806200108.w5K18sIR050132@repo.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkNFfLUZYrjX45p-33C7qZEFMVURSd5w0Z0wBA=vAvTNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmoi=sEoQyHYr=E8syBgX7au%2BvMmk34L-VfG_sZOMeTyg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:36 PM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:

> On 19 June 2018 at 20:08, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> > On 19 June 2018 at 18:08, Stephen J. Kiernan <stevek@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> Added: head/sbin/veriexecctl/Makefile
> >> ============================================================
> ==================
> >> --- /dev/null   00:00:00 1970   (empty, because file is newly added)
> >> +++ head/sbin/veriexecctl/Makefile      Wed Jun 20 01:08:54 2018
> (r335402)
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> >> +# $FreeBSD$
> >> +
> >> +PROG=  veriexecctl
> >> +MAN=   veriexecctl.8
> >> +SRCS=  veriexecctl_parse.y veriexecctl_conf.l veriexecctl.c
> >> +
> >> +WARNS?=        3
> >
> > Why are we introducing new code with lower-than-6 warnings ?
>
> In all the commotion about the more important issues this fell
> through.  Also its argument parsing appears to not be using
> getopt[_long] ?
>

I replied to this 2 days ago with:
"veriexecctl came from NetBSD originally and that is what they had,
but I believe it should be able to be bumped up."

However, there has been some discussion about just not putting in
veriexecctl for now and wait for some work that Simon Gerraty has been
doing, using some of the work for the verified loader, instead. However, it
would also mean that in the meantime, there would be nothing available
to be able to people to try out veriexec to provide some feedback until
that utility was completed and committed.

-Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEm%2B2uUfBefgHWW4WRxbS0KYSnk1FY_j28H9pTOGWhp4GoSREw>