From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Feb 19 17:53:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from crewsoft.com (ns.aenet.net [157.22.214.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B20B37B491 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.1.25] (account cberger@wireless-networks.com HELO wireless-networks.com) by crewsoft.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4b8) with ESMTP id 491565; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:56:40 -0800 Message-ID: <3A91CE37.F8C3FE80@wireless-networks.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:53:59 -0800 From: Cedric Berger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Lambert Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND References: <200102200122.SAA04466@usr05.primenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry Lambert wrote: > A registry-like configuration store, which was cached by the OS, > and was referenced directly each time the data was needed, instead > of allowing the programs to cache data which might change would > really be the best approach, but I rather think that it would be > rejected because Microsoft had the idea. Microsoft??? the idea of registry??? If I remember my old university days, our VAX 11/780 had something very simmilar... Cedric To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message