Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:46:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251019] [NEW PORT] lang/tauthon: Backwards-compatible fork of Python 2.7 interpreter with Python 3.x features Message-ID: <bug-251019-7788-A2BTifcdSn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251019-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251019-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251019 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> --- I have committed this in r557705, but we need proposals for: - what's a sensible package name prefix (py28- or ta28- or tt28- or something else?) - can we integrate it with Mk/Uses/python.mk, or should we use a separate USES=3Dtauthon and Mk/Uses/tauthon.mk on the assumption that this is essentially a dead end for ports put on life support (i. e. no Python 3.x migration) = by their respective upstream maintainers. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251019-7788-A2BTifcdSn>