Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:32:35 -0800
From:      Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?
Message-ID:  <52E59B13.5010308@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140125193809.GF67763@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <52E3806D.4020902@marino.st> <52E3F03C.1060503@freebsd.org> <52E3F454.3020206@marino.st> <52E3F600.9020009@freebsd.org> <20140125180444.GD67191@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52E40209.9060708@freebsd.org> <20140125183214.GC67763@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52E40552.4010009@freebsd.org> <20140125185925.GD67763@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <52E40B39.6080307@freebsd.org> <20140125193809.GF67763@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/25/2014 11:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> We just recovered from cvs->svn switch I think noone at all is willing to do the
> job again.
>
> Git has lots of drawbacks and if badly handled with all the above, it will be a
> real nightmare.
>
> and That is said from someone who likes git (except that the UI can get
> overcomplicated)

Git has some features that aren't in svn, and also svn has some features 
that aren't in fit, though to the lesser extent. There is no reason why 
enough important missing features can't be added to both systems over 
time so that seamless back and forth data migration would be possible. 
Because they basically do the same thing.

Yuri



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52E59B13.5010308>