From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 19 03:18:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8C81D16A4CE; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BD4D943D48; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])i4JAHewX043200;
	Wed, 19 May 2004 18:17:40 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <40AB3439.7837653E@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:17:29 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
References: <40A9D99A.34AA675D@kuzbass.ru> <20040518105817.GD70919@ip.net.ua>
	<40AABCFE.AD46764C@kuzbass.ru> <20040519092749.GA24625@ip.net.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: in_cksum_skip
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:18:11 -0000

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:48:46AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > You're apparently experimenting with IP multicasting.  There was
> > > a bug with this effect I introduced in ip_output.c,v 1.99.2.43,
> > > and shortly fixed it in rev. 1.99.2.44.  Check that your revision
> > > is not vulnerable.
> >
> > Is it safe to apply diff for just this file or that commit touched
> > more than one file?
> >
> Only this file was affected, so just updating it to rev. 1.99.2.44
> will fix the problem.

Thanks, it helps.

Eugene