From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 26 15:14:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67D615583 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:14:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29412; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199904262212.PAA29412@implode.root.com> To: Dennis Rockwell Cc: mwlucas@exceptionet.com, jonny@jonny.eng.br, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nmbclusters=4096 doesn't increase mbufs In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:01:47 EDT." <199904262001.QAA07107@po1.bbn.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:12:24 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> If 132 is the current high-water mark, and we actually have 4096 >> available, I'll shut up and go away happy. > >That is precisely the case on other related systems I've >dealt with; I cannot claim to be authoritative about this >particular version of FreeBSD, but the output of netstat -m >is similar enough that I would expect that the underlying >mechanisms are the same. Correct. Newer versions of FreeBSD show the maximum as well. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message