From owner-cvs-lib Mon Feb 6 14:50:16 1995 Return-Path: cvs-lib-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA23891 for cvs-lib-outgoing; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 14:50:16 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA23884; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 14:50:09 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA27449; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 14:50:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA00576; Mon, 6 Feb 1995 14:50:02 -0800 Message-Id: <199502062250.OAA00576@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-lib@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen getcwd.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Feb 95 12:12:50 PST." <199502062012.MAA06540@ref.tfs.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 06 Feb 1995 14:50:01 -0800 Sender: cvs-lib-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >> I feel this change is a loser... I feel very uncomfortable changing >> 15 years of historical behavior for a minor performance gain... that's >> not the way performance gains are supposed to be eeked out. > >Ok: we'll take a vote! I vote to kill the change and go back to the previous (slow) behavior. We should not be making changes that have unknown consequences at this point in the 2.1 development cycle (well, at any point in any developement cycle) - especially if we wish 2.1 to be solid. -DG