From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 19:57:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C6AB76A49; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D34DEA; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D3E6B96C; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:57:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Ed Schouten Cc: Bryan Drewery , Guido Falsi , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, jilles@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , Ed Schouten Subject: Re: svn commit: r303988 - head/lib/libc/gen Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:57:41 -0700 Message-ID: <2038784.5k3koFGWFB@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.3-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201608120703.u7C73whf007189@repo.freebsd.org> <1ce79adf-94cc-e5d3-7b8b-0914f2b07512@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:57:44 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:57:45 -0000 On Friday, August 26, 2016 09:37:10 AM Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-08-26 1:52 GMT+02:00 Bryan Drewery : > > Libc wouldn't build, it complained quite loudly with a lot of these: > > Got it. Thinking ahead, if it's just basename() giving the problems, > maybe it's easier to just go ahead and bump the symver of basename() > as well? I'm planning on replacing it anyway to be in sync with the > new basename() anyway. Attached is a new patch. Be sure to let me know > whether that works for you. Alternatively, couldn't you just leave basename out of the libgen patch for now and only add it once you do the real symver bump for the different version? (That is, just use __generic() for dirname() for now since that is the only one that has really changed.) -- John Baldwin