From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 10:34:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BA6495 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6EE21623 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VzOYU-0004sx-0d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 02:34:10 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 02:34:10 -0800 (PST) From: halieus To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1388831650014-5873697.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <525E5C25.5070305@netfence.it> References: <525E5C25.5070305@netfence.it> Subject: Re: NFSv4 security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:34:11 -0000 Hello av, did you get any response? I discovered the same behaviour as you (in 9.1-RELEASE, 9.2-RELEASE und 10.0-RC4). I too think that this is a security problem. Any advice? Regards, peter -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/NFSv4-security-tp5852289p5873697.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.